Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5049

Effects • Re: Differences in usage/sound between Spiff and SplitEQ

Spiff just sounds better. SplitEQ to me sounds watery and artefact, issue with many of these type of tools.

The only "splitEQ" i can muster is Michelangelo. Not sure what Rune did there but it actually works in a musical context.

Also Spiff's "EQ curve" is biasing curve, it doesn't actually "EQ" anything
Thanks for the reply. Why do you think that is? No one (other than Rune, but that’s different) has implemented something close to spiff since it came out? Any idea what makes the approach work?

Statistics: Posted by dyross — Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:18 pm



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5049

Trending Articles